Re: Can't use edition engraver to place \time and \tempo

[caagr98]

I would suggest adding separate functions for adding standalone text 
grobs. Would make a lot more sense than handling some types of objects 
differently.

On 07/12/2017 09:47 AM, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I merged your PR, so \time and \tempo should work now. And I prepared a 
> PR myself to streamline event-broadcasting. That works fine and marks 
> can now be added.
> With the default way for TextScript there is only one problem. I often 
> add TextScript to Staff contexts when they are TODO-marks or the like. 
> But other contexts don't consist the engraver to engrave them. So they 
> are still created by the EE and tweaks are added while incarnating the 
> grob.
> I will further test the code. If it proves stable, I will merge later.
>
> Cheers
> Jan-Peter
>
>
>
> Am 10.07.2017 um 14:33 schrieb address@hidden:
> > Oh, and another thing - it seems EE creates its own grobs for 
> > TextScripts and Marks in process-music, rather than handing them to 
> > the proper engraver in start-translation-timestep. This makes tweaks 
> > and other custom properties not work, let alone if you install a 
> > custom engraver for them. Moving their handling to 
> > start-translation-timestep seems to work fine, so why is it that way? 
> > (It does have the advantage of allowing multiple \marks at once, 
> > though.) TextScripts also don't work in the first measure if it's a 
> > MMR, which is weird. (Placing an empty chord before the MMR makes it 
> > work.)
> >
> > I'm all for having a way to manually place texts/marks, but I 
> > personally think using the default method should be the, well, 
> > default. Changing it could break existing projects that rely on that 
> > behavior, though, which is bad.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user