|
From: | Hlöðver Sigurðsson |
Subject: | Re: Parse scheme ast |
Date: | Thu, 20 Jul 2017 19:38:14 +0200 |
Hlöðver Sigurðsson <address@hidden> writes:
> Yes, that's why I wanted to experiment with boycutting the .ly->scheme-ast
> transformation step. I'm a much better lisper than c, so it's bit unclear
> to me what's going on (i've done parsers tough in the past). Are these
> public functions here maybe what I'm after
> https://github.com/lilypond/lilypond/blob/master/lily/ include/lily-guile.hh#L52-L53
> because, only by (maybe false) assumption, the lilypond lexer and parser's
> job is to create the scheme ast in the pipeline that gets sent to another
> compilation step which job is to create raw typesetted output?
I repeat:
> 2017-07-20 16:57 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>>
>> LilyPond is an interpreter, not a compiler, so it doesn't work with
>> parse trees. See lily/parser.yy for its parser (and associated actions)
>> and lily/lexer.ll for its lexer.
There is no "scheme ast". LilyPond executes its actions as soon as it
recognizes a production. Those actions ultimately assemble "book"
expressions which are then processed with functions/hooks like
toplevel-book-handler .
The basic control flow outside of the parser is done in ly/init.ly .
--
David Kastrup
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |