lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: \version statement, etc.


From: Paul Scott
Subject: Re: \version statement, etc.
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 09:42:56 -0700
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:54:47PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Paul Scott <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > I may be downloading while changes are in progress.
> >
> > I just downloaded and installed 2.19.80 (what happened to 2.19.66 through
> > 2.19.79?)
> >
> > 2.19.80 doesn't seem to see my version statements:
> >
> > plentyr3.ly:1: warning: no \version statement found, please add
> >
> > \version "2.19.80"
> >
> > for future compatibility
> >
> > Under 2.19.80 documentation:
> >
> > Changes docs refer to 2.20 and the Notation manual still seems to be for
> > 2.19.65.
> 
> 2.19.80 is a prerelease for 2.20: it is not released from master but the
> stable/2.20 branch.  It still counts as developer release though, so the
> developer Notation manual gets updated
> <http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/index.html>.  It
> states "LilyPond — Notation Reference v2.19.80 (development-branch)."
> which is not entirely correct regarding the branch used.  But correcting
> that while the prerelease is in progress is likely more trouble than it
> would be worth: it would be too easy to forget changing it back.

Notation manual is now correct maybe a cache issue.

\include brings the version warning as follows:

To avoid changing the version on each of my many .ly files I put the
version in a .ily which has the music and is included in each .ly which sets
up the individual part.

Here is a minimal example of my version situation:

vtest.ly:

\version "2.19.80" 
\relative{ c''4 }

called by:

vtesti.ily:

\include "vtest.ly"

i.e.:

address@hidden:~/music/tcb$ lilypond vtesti.ily 
GNU LilyPond 2.19.80
Processing `vtesti.ily'
Parsing...
vtesti.ily:1: warning: no \version statement found, please add

\version "2.19.80"

for future compatibility

...

Thank you,

Paul





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]