[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Any other Thunderbird users have messages never post? (WAS: Hide slu
From: |
David Wright |
Subject: |
Re: Any other Thunderbird users have messages never post? (WAS: Hide slur?) |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Oct 2017 12:19:20 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon 23 Oct 2017 at 11:10:23 (+0200), Robin Bannister wrote:
> Karlin High wrote:
>
> >Curiouser and curiouser. The part that bugs me the worst is when I do
> >a Reply-All and the message never appears on the list, but then the
> >other recipients of my message ALSO do a Reply-All, and have their
> >replies to my message get posted to list, making it seem that my
> >message delivered everywhere but to the list. Most recent example
> >here, in David Nalesnik's automatic partwriter thread:
> >
> >https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2017-09/msg00471.html
> >
> >That makes it hard not to blame something on the GNU Lists end of things.
>
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2017-10/msg00129.html
>
> The end of this thread shows a Reply-All from me reaching the recipient
> but not the list.
>
> The list archive knows enough about it to say "Message not available".
AIUI that line is merely a placeholder. If a posting has a line
like In-Reply-To: <foo> and the list doesn't already have a
matching Message-ID: <foo> then it threads the posting to the
placeholder rather than threading it to any old message or
starting a new thread.
So the question is why your Message-ID: <address@hidden>
didn't arrive on the list. Perhaps the spam scan produced a false
positive. Has this started happening within the past year? I notice
that your postings are submitted slightly differently from
previously. Unfortunately the partial scorings aren't revealed in
the headers on this list.
Cheers,
David.