[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sesqui-flat spelling
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: sesqui-flat spelling |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:45:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Edward Neeman <address@hidden> writes:
> Hello all,
>
> I've gotten quite used to the fact that "as" is A flat and "es" is E
> flat in Lilypond. Is there a reason why sesqui-flats need to be
> spelled aeseh and eeseh (instead of the abbreviated "aseh" or "eseh")?
I don't think so. Note names in LilyPond, at least for half notes, are
made up as far as I remember. For generation by computer, aes and ees
(and their derivatives) make some sense to support. As the only option,
that seems a bit weird.
--
David Kastrup