Re: Is anyone maintaining midi2ly?

[karl]

David Kastrup:
> Michael Ellis <address@hidden> writes:
...
> > The MuseScore output is correct and matches the tempo and meter items
> > embedded in the original midi file (attached).  I've also verified with 2 
> > different
> > DAW's (Reaper and Logic X) that the midi file is imported correctly.

The midi file matches your msc2-meter-example.png, I can show you
(Michael) a dump if you like.

> > The application that produced the midi file is called tbon. It's a 
> > shorthand notation
> > language I wrote for projects where fast notation entry is more important 
> > than
> > having the full capabilities of LilyPond.  If you're curious about tbon, go 
> > to
> > https://github.com/Michael-F-Ellis/tbon . The README has a link to a live 
> > online
> > demo.

Nice idea to have c--c mean c8. c16 which is much more error prone to 
type.

You could probably change your python program to output lilypond code
directly.

> > I'd really rather use LP than MuseScore for the times when I want to 
> > engrave the
> > output from tbon since LP still produces better looking scores, imo, but 
> > not being
> > able to handle meter changes is a showstopper.
> 
> I get correct PDF output on 2.21.0 but a nonsensical wash of bar checks
> that appear to cater to 2/4 throughout.

And here with 2.19.16.

The bar checks fails because midi2ly puts in barchecks in the wrong 
places, don't know why.

///

Regarding your subject line question, I don't know.
I make my own midi -> ly converter though, currently in an experimental
leap...

Regards,
/Karl Hammar

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden
+46 173 140 57