Re: Is anyone maintaining midi2ly?

[David Wright]

On Sat 30 Dec 2017 at 23:11:04 (+0000), Michael Ellis wrote:
> David Kastrup wrote:
> 
>    - I get correct PDF output on 2.21.0 but a nonsensical wash of bar
>    checks that appear to cater to 2/4 throughout.
> 
> Thanks for testing it, David.  What options did you use for midi2ly and
> lilypond?  My command lines were:
> 
> ./midi2ly.py -o meter.ly -n -V 1 meter.midi

What's odd to me is that all the midi2ly programs I have
are lacking the .py extension. They also object to being
fed a -n option. (Also, the program wouldn't normally be
found in the same directory as users' data files.)

> lilypond meter.ly
> 
> I only got one bar check complaint when LP processed meter.ly which
> contains:
> 
> TrackA = {
>   \numericTimeSignature\time 4/4  c'4 d'4 e'4 f'4  |  % orig
>   \numericTimeSignature\time 2/4  g'8 a'8 g'8 g'8 a'8 g'8 c''4  |  % orig
>   \numericTimeSignature\time 6/8  c''4 g'8 a'8 g'8 g'8 a'8 g'8  |  % orig
>   \numericTimeSignature\time 2/4  c''4 c''4 r2  |  % orig
> }

…whose format doesn't resemble the output I get from midi2ly with
$ ~/lilypond-2.19.80-1/bin/midi2ly -o /tmp/meter1980.ly /tmp/meter.midi 

Cheers,
David.

meter1980.ly
Description: Text document