[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Two conflicting text spanners
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: Two conflicting text spanners |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Jan 2018 11:31:35 -0500 |
Hi Neo,
> I was afraid that without any instructions the code in that thread would
> fail,
> but to my surprise it worked beautifully! Thank you!
You're welcome. From what I understand, the code has some issues, but it seemed
like it would solve your use case.
> I wonder why this isn't coded into LP itself or provided as a snippet
> with the software or in some repository (or am I mistaken?)
As far as I know, you're not mistaken: it's not in the codebase, nor provided
as a snippet. I would imagine the limitations (see the email thread) are a
sufficient obstacle to the functionality being considered for the main
codebase… and even if not, the path to getting a patch created, submitted,
reviewed, and accepted can be long and steep, and perhaps David N has
higher-priority ways he is applying his Lilypond-based time at the moment.
I believe there is general agreement that all spanners should support ids, but
there are evidently technical hurdles to making this happen.
Hope that helps!
Kieren.
________________________________
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: address@hidden