[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Grace notes & Co, style question
From: |
Jacques Menu Muzhic |
Subject: |
Re: Grace notes & Co, style question |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jan 2018 07:21:09 +0100 |
Hello Joram,
Thanks for the clarification!
JM
> Le 23 janv. 2018 à 21:42, Noeck <address@hidden> a écrit :
>
> Hi Jacques,
>
> in your 8 bars, you have only 4 different outcomes of your 8 different
> inputs, combinations of (slashed/unslashed) and (slurred/unslurred). I
> would just recommend to use the relevant command instead of adding extra
> slurs to the input, i.e. to use your first line:
>
> 1. no slash, no slur: \grace
> 2. slash and slur: \acciaccatura
> 3. slash but no slur: \slashedGrace
> 4. no slash but slur: \appoggiatura
>
> But that recommendation is just because it seems cleaner to me because
> it does not duplicate things (slurs).
>
> At least the duplication does not seem to have side effects, there are
> no double slurs or so. I looked at the source code and the slurred
> variants have a 'SlurEvent ... START and ... STOP around them. So I
> guess if you add a slur, it does not change anything as the slur is
> alread "activated". But the developers might correct me.
>
> Cheers,
> Joram
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user