[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: duration longer than meter?
|
From: |
Thomas Morley |
|
Subject: |
Re: duration longer than meter? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 3 Feb 2018 21:38:56 +0100 |
2018-02-03 20:18 GMT+01:00 Blöchl Bernhard <address@hidden>:
> Do not waste your time! I argue the majority does not want to discuss that
> topic seriously.
Welcome on my black-list.
> Read the whole thread starting with:
>
> Betreff turning a blind eye to dotted note
Indeed, do so
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/turning-a-blind-eye-to-dotted-note-td209224.html
-Harm
- Re: duration longer than meter?, (continued)
- Re: duration longer than meter?, Blöchl Bernhard, 2018/02/03
- Re: duration longer than meter?, N. Andrew Walsh, 2018/02/03
- Re: duration longer than meter?, Blöchl Bernhard, 2018/02/03
- Re: duration longer than meter?, Noeck, 2018/02/03
- Re: duration longer than meter?, Simon Albrecht, 2018/02/03
- Re: duration longer than meter?, Blöchl Bernhard, 2018/02/03
- Re: duration longer than meter?, Kieren MacMillan, 2018/02/03
- Re: duration longer than meter?, David Kastrup, 2018/02/03
- Re: duration longer than meter?, Kieren MacMillan, 2018/02/03
- Re: duration longer than meter?, Simon Albrecht, 2018/02/03
Re: duration longer than meter?,
Thomas Morley <=
Re: duration longer than meter?, Blöchl Bernhard, 2018/02/03
Re: duration longer than meter?, Blöchl Bernhard, 2018/02/03