[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: that migrating "opus"

From: Mark Stephen Mrotek
Subject: RE: that migrating "opus"
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 20:41:44 -0800



Attached is a compliable snippet. Your comments/suggestions are greatly appreciated.




From: lilypond-user [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Ben
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2018 6:36 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: that migrating "opus"


On 3/8/2018 7:17 PM, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:



I am setting a Haydn piano sonata


\version "2.19.80"

\header {

  title = "Sonata"

  composer = "F. J. Haydn"

  opus = "XVI:6"


\include ""


\include ""


\include ""



As expected the “opus” migrates to each and every score. The documentation states:  “only piece and opus fields are printed by default in Score Titles.”

Since I have not, in my limited experience, seen an opus number on each movement that I have read, I am asking for the rational/purpose for having the opus migrate.


Thank you for your kind attention.




Hi Mark,

As you probably know, your code doesn't compile at all (due to the includes) so I can't really see the opus situation as you describe it.

But the opus does appear under the composer as expected otherwise. Can you share code that we can compile to see what you're talking about more regarding the opus?

Description: Text Data

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]