Re: that migrating "opus"

[David Wright]

On Thu 08 Mar 2018 at 21:35:34 (-0800), Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
> David,
> 
> Very interesting, been there, done that!

Except that the example you just posted doesn't seem to indicate
that you took anything away from the one already posted in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2017-04/msg00784.html
which you could use as a pattern for your own scores.

> Now I am focusing on Haydn Sonatas - very inventive!
> 
> Mark
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Wright [mailto:address@hidden 
> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2018 9:20 PM
> To: Mark Stephen Mrotek <address@hidden>
> Cc: 'Lilypond-User Mailing List' <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: that migrating "opus"
> 
> On Thu 08 Mar 2018 at 16:17:16 (-0800), Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
> > I am setting a Haydn piano sonata
> > \version "2.19.80"
> > \header {
> >   title = "Sonata"
> >   composer = "F. J. Haydn"
> >   opus = "XVI:6"
> > }
> > \include "XVI-6-1.ly"
> > \pageBreak
> > \include "XVI-6-2a.ly"
> > \pageBreak
> > \include "XVI-6-2b.ly"
> > \pageBreak
> > 
> > As expected the "opus" migrates to each and every score. The 
> > documentation
> > states:  "only piece and opus fields are printed by default in Score 
> > Titles."
> > 
> > Since I have not, in my limited experience, seen an opus number on 
> > each movement that I have read, I am asking for the rational/purpose 
> > for having the opus migrate.
> 
> If I've got hold of the right end of the stick, imagine you're setting the 
> Brahms opus 118 Klavierstüke, then you would label the six scores thus:
> 
> 1: piece=Intermezzo, opus=opus 118 no 1
> 2: piece=Intermezzo, opus=opus 118 no 2
> 3: piece=Ballade,    opus=opus 118 no 3
> 4: piece=Intermezzo, opus=opus 118 no 4
> 5: piece=Romanze,    opus=opus 118 no 5
> 6: piece=Intermezzo, opus=opus 118 no 6
> 
> Cheers,
> David.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Cheers,
David.