|
From: | Arle Lommel |
Subject: | Re: Double ties: Can't tweak both ties. |
Date: | Mon, 12 Mar 2018 14:38:07 -0400 |
Thank you for looking at what I sent earlier, Carl. Turns out that it *doesn’t* actually work like I thought it did. Here is a real tiny example of the problem: \version "2.18.2" \relative c'' { \tieUp <d f>2 <cis e>2 ~ | <cis!-\shape #'((0 . 2) (0 . 2) (0 . 2) (0 . 2))~ e-\shape #'((0 . 2) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 2))~>1 | <cis! e>1 | } That yields this: First tie moved as expected, but the second one (E to E) doesn’t budge (it should be inverted with the values I gave it). (This would actually solve my problem graphically, but when I tried it in my actual score, things didn’t work as expected at all, with things moving in seemingly random ways I cannot replicate in a tiny example.) But if I insert a \break into the mix: \version "2.18.2" \relative c'' { \tieUp <d f>2 <cis e>2 ~ | \break <cis!-\shape #'((0 . 2) (0 . 2) (0 . 2) (0 . 2))~ e-\shape #'((0 . 2) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 2))~>1 | <cis! e>1 | } I get this: Now the second \shape command works, but the first one no longer does. I think I’ve uncovered a genuine bug. I doubt very much that this is anyone’s idea of how this should work. I guess I’ll have to report it. Best -Arle |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |