[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ties across voices
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Ties across voices |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Jun 2018 18:51:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Carl Sorensen" <address@hidden>
> To: "Simon Albrecht" <address@hidden>; "Shachar Shemesh"
> <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 4:52 PM
> Subject: Re: Ties across voices
>
>
>>
>>
>> On 6/17/18, 12:14 PM, "Simon Albrecht" <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> On 16.06.2018 20:41, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>> > The Tie won't tie between the voices and the chord past the voices.
>>
>> It seems to work if you move the Tie_engraver from Voice to Staff
>> level:
>>
>> I moved Tie_performer along, since you were talking about the
>> importance
>> of accurate MIDI for your use case. I don’t use MIDI (or hardly
>> ever) so
>> I can’t test reasonably, but it should work, I imagine.
>>
>> This looks like the right answer, and one that maybe ought to be
>> documented in a docs snippet. Lots of people use the LSR trick of
>> hidden notes, when a more straightforward approach is to move the
>> Tie_engraver.
>>
>> I wonder if having the Tie_engraver be in the Staff ought to be the
>> default? Can anyone see negatives to having it be in the Staff?
>
> If it means ties will tie equal pitch notes in, say, voiceOne with
> others in voiceTwo, both on the same stave, it seems like an excellent
> change.
tieWaitForNote would work worse in several situations. So would other
things like a choir unison note held over a bar.
--
David Kastrup