[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output
From: |
Urs Liska |
Subject: |
Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Jul 2018 15:43:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 |
Am 25.07.2018 um 14:21 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
OK, we're getting closer. There is a *substantial* difference in the
results of fc-list | grep TeX when run from the system fontconfig
and the one packaged with LilyPond:
Have you played with the `FC_CONFIG' environment variable? Say
FC_CONFIG=31 fc-list | less
to get a *very* detailed output how fontconfig finds something. You
might then compare the outputs of the two programs.
Thanks for that hint. This gives indeed more details but actually
confirms the prior finding:
Debian's fc-list finds (shortened output, and deliberatly choosing the
Bold Italic case):
Font 98 Pattern has 24 elts (size 24)
family: "TeX Gyre Adventor"(w)
style: "Bold Italic"(w)
fullname: "TeXGyreAdventor-BoldItalic"(w)
file:
"/usr/share/texmf/fonts/opentype/public/tex-gyre/texgyreadventor-bolditalic.otf"(w)
fontformat: "CFF"(w)
postscriptname: "TeXGyreAdventor-BoldItalic"(w)
LilyPond's fc-list finds
Font 255 Pattern has 19 elts (size 19)
family: "TeXGyreAdventor"(w)
style: "BoldItalic"(w)
file: "/usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1/qagbi.pfb"(w)
fontformat: "Type 1"(w)
postscriptname: "TeXGyreAdventor-BoldItalic"(w)
After the section with the detailed font patterns there is a list with
concise entries.
There Debian's fc-list finds
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/opentype/public/tex-gyre/texgyreadventor-bolditalic.otf:
TeX Gyre Adventor:style=Bold Italic
while LilyPond's finds
/usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1/qagbi.pfb: TeXGyreAdventor:style=BoldItalic
So I realize that my problems in Frescobaldi stem from the fact that
LilyPond finds different fonts than the operating system. But I don't
really have an idea as to what to make of it.
Currently it looks like my best bet would be to simply split a reported
style of "BoldItalic" in two words but leave it as it is in other cases
(e.g. leave SemiBold alone). This really doesn't feel like a sane
solution ...
Urs
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, (continued)
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Urs Liska, 2018/07/19
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Urs Liska, 2018/07/24
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, David Wright, 2018/07/24
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Urs Liska, 2018/07/24
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Federico Bruni, 2018/07/25
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Urs Liska, 2018/07/25
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Federico Bruni, 2018/07/25
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Urs Liska, 2018/07/25
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/07/25
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output,
Urs Liska <=
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/07/25
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Urs Liska, 2018/07/25
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/07/25
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Urs Liska, 2018/07/25
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Urs Liska, 2018/07/25
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Torsten Hämmerle, 2018/07/25
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Urs Liska, 2018/07/25
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Torsten Hämmerle, 2018/07/25
- Re: Format of -dshow-available-fonts output, Urs Liska, 2018/07/25