lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Edition Engraver suppress log files


From: Craig Dabelstein
Subject: Re: Edition Engraver suppress log files
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 19:24:38 +1000

No problem. Thank you Jan-Peter.

On Tue., 16 Oct. 2018, 6:49 pm Jan-Peter Voigt, <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi Craig,

I merged to master, but added a comment, that the names of the option
and the file will change, like Urs and I discussed.

This change shall be integrated soon, but right now I have to do some
other jobs with higher priority.

Jan-Peter


Am 15.10.2018 um 22:00 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
> The new branch worked perfectly for me Jan-Peter.
>
> Craig
>
>
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 at 21:53, Craig Dabelstein
> <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
>     You two are amazing. I don't know where any of us would be without you.
>
>     Craig
>
>     On Mon., 15 Oct. 2018, 7:19 pm Jan-Peter Voigt, <address@hidden
>     <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
>         Am 15.10.2018 um 11:13 schrieb Urs Liska:
>         >
>         >
>         > Am 15.10.2018 um 11:07 schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
>         >> Hi Urs,
>         >>
>         >> I combine the answers:
>         >> The *.edition.log file might be named differently - not .log
>         - as this
>         >> file has a purpose outside the debug-log realm. And this is
>         the reason
>         >> I'd vote against writing the edition-context-information in a
>         global log
>         >> file.
>         >
>         > Yes, that points in the right direction. In that sense the EE
>         "log" is
>         > comparable to scholarLY's export files.
>         >
>         >> But for all debug-logs piping them into one (optional) files
>         makes
>         >> absolutely sense. How this file should be formatted is
>         another question.
>         >> And sometimes it is helpful if the log is written before Lily
>         crashes
>         >> ;-) so it might be worth writing immediatly.
>         >
>         > That's also true, and I had thought about this. But with your
>         previous
>         > comment we can solve the issue. If we're separating package
>         specific
>         > export files from traditional logs the logs don't have to be
>         sectioned.
>         > So we can format them similarly to usual log files, have a package
>         > identifier at the beginning of each entry and simply write
>         them out
>         > immediately.
>         >
>         > And if I think of it, most of that is already implemented in
>         oll-core.
>         > There we have the functions  oll:log, oll:debug, oll:warn
>         etc., combined
>         > with the possibility to set the log-level. The only things
>         we'd need is
>         > the option to write the log or not, and the tagging of
>         messages with the
>         > package prefix.
>         >
>         > So I suggest you rename both the export filename and the
>         option in the
>         > EE, and we'll do the other thing separately.
>         > OK I'll do that later and will think about the edition-context
>         file
>         structure. The paths shall be copyable ...
>
>         Jan-Peter
>
>
>
> --
> *Craig Dabelstein*
> Maxime's Music
> address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> /http://maximesmusic.com/


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]