[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GrandStaff vertical distance
From: |
Brian Barker |
Subject: |
Re: GrandStaff vertical distance |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Oct 2018 05:35:45 +0100 |
At 14:40 17/10/2018 -0500, David Wright wrote:
The # wiki notes that British Telecom used the term "square" for
hash at one time.
Surely not? Rather, they presumably used the term "square" for square
- which is what was on the spare key on early designs of keyboard now
occupied by the hash character. See
http://www.britishtelephones.com/t94xx.htm .
I guess this was before the British public had an unambiguous name
for it, "pound" being verboten, ...
Indeed: "pound" would have been as silly as "dollar" or "yen" or whatever.
... "number" rare, ...
UK usage is "No.", of course.
... and "hash" not quite proper in polite society.
Really? Always appropriate in my company!
Brian Barker
- Re: GrandStaff vertical distance, (continued)
- Re: GrandStaff vertical distance, Aaron Hill, 2018/10/12
- Re: GrandStaff vertical distance, foxfanfare, 2018/10/13
- Re: GrandStaff vertical distance, Lukas-Fabian Moser, 2018/10/13
- Re: GrandStaff vertical distance, foxfanfare, 2018/10/13
- Re: GrandStaff vertical distance, Thomas Morley, 2018/10/14
- Re: GrandStaff vertical distance, Lukas-Fabian Moser, 2018/10/14
- Re: GrandStaff vertical distance, Thomas Morley, 2018/10/14
- Re: GrandStaff vertical distance, Thomas Morley, 2018/10/17
- Re: GrandStaff vertical distance, Thomas Morley, 2018/10/17
- Re: GrandStaff vertical distance, David Wright, 2018/10/17
- Re: GrandStaff vertical distance,
Brian Barker <=
- Re: GrandStaff vertical distance, Aaron Hill, 2018/10/18
- [OT] Re: GrandStaff vertical distance, David Wright, 2018/10/18
- Re: GrandStaff vertical distance, Thomas Morley, 2018/10/18
- Re: GrandStaff vertical distance, Thomas Morley, 2018/10/18