help-gplusplus post from address@hidden requires approval

[help-gplusplus-owner]

As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:

    List:    address@hidden
    From:    address@hidden
    Subject: Re: 2 pass compiling
    Reason:  Post by non-member to a members-only list

At your convenience, visit:

    http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/admindb/help-gplusplus
        
to approve or deny the request.
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: 2 pass compiling
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> 09 Jul 2007 00:11:16 GMT
>
>
>
>
> In article <address@hidden>,
>         =?iso-8859-2?q?Seweryn_Habdank-Wojew=F3dzki?= <address@hidden> writes:
> > Dears
> > 
> > I heard some theories, that "it is easy" NOT to force user to properly
> > order definitions in classes. And all can be done in two pass
>
> the same would go for declaring variables: the compiler could easily
> figure out the variable-type with a second pass. but it doesn't do
> so since it would be confusing for the programmer! not all circular
> dependencies actually result in meaningful code, so I guess it is
> best to avoid all of them anyway. I too experienced this problem:
> forward-declaration of a class who's declaration is located within
> another class is not allowed in g++, it seems. but is is useful?
> -- 
> Better send the eMails to netscape.net, as to
> evade useless burthening of my provider's /dev/null...
>
> P
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> confirm a8475c46b4dffab214018acf3e6b2513b42b0694
>
>
>
>
> If you reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact,
> Mailman will discard the held message.  Do this if the message is
> spam.  If you reply to this message and include an Approved: header
> with the list password in it, the message will be approved for posting
> to the list.  The Approved: header can also appear in the first line
> of the body of the reply.
>
> --- End Message ---