lmi-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lmi-commits] [5577] Improve documentation


From: Greg Chicares
Subject: [lmi-commits] [5577] Improve documentation
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 13:44:15 +0000

Revision: 5577
          http://svn.sv.gnu.org/viewvc/?view=rev&root=lmi&revision=5577
Author:   chicares
Date:     2012-10-08 13:44:15 +0000 (Mon, 08 Oct 2012)
Log Message:
-----------
Improve documentation

Modified Paths:
--------------
    lmi/trunk/ChangeLog
    lmi/trunk/input_harmonization.cpp

Modified: lmi/trunk/ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- lmi/trunk/ChangeLog 2012-10-06 10:59:15 UTC (rev 5576)
+++ lmi/trunk/ChangeLog 2012-10-08 13:44:15 UTC (rev 5577)
@@ -30777,3 +30777,27 @@
 "unknown XML parsing error". Testcase:
   lmi_cli_shared.exe --accept --file=nonexistent.cns
 
+20121004T1215Z <address@hidden> [567]
+
+  cell.rnc
+  cell.xsd
+Improve documentation.
+
+20121004T1902Z <address@hidden> [567]
+
+  mec_server.cpp
+  mec_xml_document.cpp
+  mec_xml_document.hpp
+Refactor for simplicity.
+
+20121006T1059Z <address@hidden> [567]
+
+  ihs_acctval.cpp
+Improve documentation.
+
+20121008T1344Z <address@hidden> [567]
+
+  input_harmonization.cpp
+Improve documentation. There's no point in adding a database entity to
+control a feature that's not yet implemented.
+

Modified: lmi/trunk/input_harmonization.cpp
===================================================================
--- lmi/trunk/input_harmonization.cpp   2012-10-06 10:59:15 UTC (rev 5576)
+++ lmi/trunk/input_harmonization.cpp   2012-10-08 13:44:15 UTC (rev 5577)
@@ -705,7 +705,7 @@
 //
 // TODO ?? WX PORT !! But for now, use this workaround: products that have no
 // general account can't select non-custom funds--there's no GUI for
-// that anyway. DATABASE !! Consider adding an 'allow fund choice' entity.
+// that anyway. INPUT !! See: http://savannah.nongnu.org/support/?104481
 //
     FundChoiceType.allow(mce_fund_selection, !sepacct_only);
 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]