[lmi-commits] [lmi] master 859e100 1/6: Move implementation of pure virtual dtor out of header

[Greg Chicares]

branch: master
commit 859e1005916545088e4dfb2a1b548eb5c8524e6b
Author: Gregory W. Chicares <address@hidden>
Commit: Gregory W. Chicares <address@hidden>

    Move implementation of pure virtual dtor out of header
    
    See:
      http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/lmi/2017-03/msg00035.html
    
    This commit essentially reverted the 20170306T1014 change, captioned
      Implement pure virtual dtor inline in header
    but retained the commentary changes.
---
 datum_sequence.cpp | 9 +++++++++
 datum_sequence.hpp | 9 ---------
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/datum_sequence.cpp b/datum_sequence.cpp
index f97fa15..2cf6c01 100644
--- a/datum_sequence.cpp
+++ b/datum_sequence.cpp
@@ -46,6 +46,15 @@ datum_sequence::datum_sequence(std::string const& s)
     assert_sanity();
 }
 
+/// Implementation of pure virtual destructor.
+///
+/// Neither this explicitly-defaulted implementation nor any other can
+/// be written inside the class definition because C++11 [10.4/3] says
+/// "a function declaration cannot provide both a pure-specifier and a
+/// definition".
+
+datum_sequence::~datum_sequence() = default;
+
 datum_sequence& datum_sequence::operator=(std::string const& s)
 {
     datum_string::operator=(s);
diff --git a/datum_sequence.hpp b/datum_sequence.hpp
index 1e218d3..c6cc9bc 100644
--- a/datum_sequence.hpp
+++ b/datum_sequence.hpp
@@ -94,15 +94,6 @@ class datum_sequence
     bool keyword_values_are_blocked_;
 };
 
-/// Implementation of pure virtual destructor.
-///
-/// Neither this explicitly-defaulted implementation nor any other can
-/// be written inside the class definition because C++11 [10.4/3] says
-/// "a function declaration cannot provide both a pure-specifier and a
-/// definition".
-
-inline datum_sequence::~datum_sequence() = default;
-
 bool operator==(datum_sequence const&, datum_sequence const&);
 
 // Specialize value_cast<> for each derived class, e.g., as follows: