lmi
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lmi] xsl-fo testing: variable_annuity.xsl


From: Greg Chicares
Subject: Re: [lmi] xsl-fo testing: variable_annuity.xsl
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:27:06 +0000
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)

On 2007-06-13 15:28Z, Boutin, Wendy wrote:
> 
> Problem executing command
> Output:
> [INFO] Using org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser as SAX2 Parser
> [ERROR] javax.xml.transform.TransformerConfigurationException:
> javax.xml.transform.TransformerException:
> javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: "padding-left" attribute is
> not allowed on the xsl:text element!
> Exit code 2 from command 'CMD /c /fop-0.20.5/fop -xsl
> "../data/variable_annuity.xsl" -xml
> "c:/fop-0.20.5/unnamed2.000000000.xml"
> "c:/fop-0.20.5/unnamed2.000000000.pdf"'.

Evgeniy, can you address that directly in cvs please? I suspect
it will occur with any use of 'variable_annuity.xsl', probably
with any old xml dataset you have.

> select okay, then this messagebox appears:
> 
> Report formatting failed.
> The specific command that failed was 'CMD /c /fop-0.20.5/fop -xsl
> "../data/variable_annuity.xsl" -xml
> "c:/fop-0.20.5/unnamed2.000000000.xml"
> "c:/fop-0.20.5/unnamed2.000000000.pdf"'.
> [file c:/opt/lmi/src/lmi/ledger_xsl.cpp, line 160]
> 
> . Yesterday, only the second message box displayed with 
> variable_annuity.xsl, but today their seems to be another
> layer.

Specifically, since 20070613T0003Z .

> Can you fix this please

See
  http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/lmi/2007-06/msg00004.html
| I'm still
| dissatisfied with a few details, but instead of listing them
| here I think it better to ask others if they see anything that
| calls for improvement.

That's one of the details on my list. I'd like to hear what
else you see. I have very concrete plans to change some things
like this myself, but haven't had time to finish them yet,
and wanted to get the 20070613T0003Z changes in right away
because of meeting and vacation schedules.

It's certainly a defect. But the showstopper is not that
they see two messages; it's that they can't get a printout.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]