Re: [lmi] Input-sequence editor testing

[Greg Chicares]

On 2011-03-03 18:27Z, Václav Slavík wrote:
> 
> On 1 Sep 2010, at 20:09, Vaclav Slavik wrote:
>> One thing to do is to change the duration_num_field() into wxSpinCtrl
>> with limited range, and I will do that.
> 
> Here's updated version of the patch, with this and another minor fix
> (extra newline in error messages) implemented.

Although I'm still distracted by non-lmi projects, I'm trying proposed
patches in a local branch--at least to be sure that any changes of my
own that I have to apply now are not inconsistent with anything you're
doing. I've saved the patches themselves in local files as follows:

20100825vs.patch  http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/lmi/2010-08/msg00018.html
20100901vs.patch  http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/lmi/2010-09/msg00000.html
20100928vz.patch  http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/lmi/2010-09/msg00001.html
20101105vs.patch  http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/lmi/2010-11/msg00000.html
20110303vs.patch  http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/lmi/2011-03/msg00000.html

Until this month, I had applied the first four of those five patches
in chronological order against lmi HEAD, successfully. Now I'm trying
to apply the fifth--the most recent--and I must be doing something
wrong because "5 out of 16 hunks FAILED". I think 20110303 supersedes
20100901, but excluding 20100901 and applying the other four patches
to a fresh copy of HEAD in chronological order fails on 20110303. And
applying 20110303 alone to HEAD fails, too. Could you please tell me
which of the older patches I should disregard when applying 20110303?