[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lmi] Not urgent: a plausible micro-optimization
|
From: |
Greg Chicares |
|
Subject: |
Re: [lmi] Not urgent: a plausible micro-optimization |
|
Date: |
Thu, 22 Feb 2018 01:40:25 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 |
On 2018-02-17 16:56, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
[...]
> https://github.com/vadz/lmi/pull/68
Applied in spirit. C++ lambdas are far better than std::unary_function<T,T>,
but I don't think I'll ever find them as easy to read as flat procedural code:
the weird syntax keeps them from being altogether transparent.
- [lmi] Not urgent: a plausible micro-optimization, Greg Chicares, 2018/02/15
- Re: [lmi] Not urgent: a plausible micro-optimization, Vadim Zeitlin, 2018/02/17
- Re: [lmi] Not urgent: a plausible micro-optimization, Greg Chicares, 2018/02/21
- Re: [lmi] Not urgent: a plausible micro-optimization,
Greg Chicares <=
- Re: [lmi] Not urgent: a plausible micro-optimization, Vadim Zeitlin, 2018/02/22
- Re: [lmi] Not urgent: a plausible micro-optimization, Greg Chicares, 2018/02/22
- Re: [lmi] Not urgent: a plausible micro-optimization, Greg Chicares, 2018/02/22
- Re: [lmi] Not urgent: a plausible micro-optimization, Vadim Zeitlin, 2018/02/22
- Re: [lmi] Not urgent: a plausible micro-optimization, Greg Chicares, 2018/02/23
- Re: [lmi] Not urgent: a plausible micro-optimization, Vadim Zeitlin, 2018/02/23