[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lout on BeOS
From: |
Lonnell L Peters |
Subject: |
Re: Lout on BeOS |
Date: |
Sun, 2 Apr 2000 10:55:53 -0400 (EDT) |
I'm glad to hear that you were able to port Lout to BeOS. I tried several
months ago to port Lout 2.17 to BeOS 4.5, but couldn't get it to work.
There were problems with the hash functions that were causing segfaults.
I didn't look to closely at it though, but it seems that what you
mentioned could have had something to do with the problem.
Lonnell
On Sat, 1 Apr 2000, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
> I have successfully compiled lout-3.19 on BeOS 5 Personal Edition
> (released by Be, Inc for free right on my birthday ;-).
>
> The only problem I've encountered was the fact the BeOS have data
> segment starting at (or above, I don't know) 0x80000000, so several
> hash functions that use object address as a seed have to be fixed to
> cast the pointer to unsigned type. Thanks to Jeff for promptly
> pointing out all the places where this happens.
>
> Patch attached. It probably makes sense to declare all those 'pos'
> variables as size_t instead of explicit unsigned type just for the
> sake of more clean code.
>
> PS: Any Be fans that care to make binaries and sumbit them to BeBits?
>
> SY, Uwe
> --
> address@hidden | Zu Grunde kommen
> http://www.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/ | Ist zu Grunde gehen
>
- Lout on BeOS, Valeriy E. Ushakov, 2000/04/01
- Re: Lout on BeOS,
Lonnell L Peters <=