[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: current thoughts on PDF back end
From: |
Sebastien Pierre |
Subject: |
Re: current thoughts on PDF back end |
Date: |
Mon, 14 May 2001 01:04:12 +0400 (MSD) |
Well, for me as long as you can do the same (or more) with ps2pdf as
with the PDF backend I see no problem for this option. But maybe there
are some things PDF can do and PS can't ?
I thought PDF was the successor to PS ; but I'm not sure... the point
would be wether PS will be ok for Lout's possible evolutions in terms
of features. Maybe PDF has better bitmap image managment and font
inclusion support than PS. I really don't know, so maybe somebody has
info on those issues ?
Cheers,
Sébastien.
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, (continued)
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, Paul Selormey, 2001/05/13
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, Michael Piotrowski, 2001/05/13
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, David Duffy, 2001/05/13
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, Mikko Huhtala, 2001/05/14
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, bln, 2001/05/14
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, Christoph Breitkopf, 2001/05/14
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, Christian Mock, 2001/05/14
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end,
Sebastien Pierre <=
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, Sebastien Pierre, 2001/05/14
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, Jeff Kingston, 2001/05/14
- Re: current thoughts on PDF back end, Sebastien Pierre, 2001/05/15