Re: [Ltib] Recommended cvs branch or label for automated integration testing

[Stuart Hughes]

Hi Ken,

FYI, you can run ltib in 'headless' batch mode from the get-go if you
like, after: cvs co ltib 

$./ltib --batch  --preconfig config/platform/<target>/defconfig

There are all sorts of combinations that will work too (with --profile
etc).

Regards, Stuart

On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 17:49 -0500, Ken Gilmer wrote:
> Stuart,
> 
>    Ok great, I'll use that date.  I was able to run LTIB headless  
> after running it once manually, configuring for my target system, and  
> then saving the [ltib root]/.config and the [ltib root]/config/ 
> platform/[my target]/.config files.  I run an Ant script that does  
> the ltib checkout, then copies my config, and then runs "perl ltib".   
> Seems to work well so far.  Next is to incorporate my own packages  
> into the mix...
> 
> thanks
> ken
> 
> 
> On Feb 14, 2007, at 3:43 AM, Stuart Hughes wrote:
> 
> > Hi Ken,
> >
> > There are tags for releases that are made into tarballs, they are
> > prefixed with rel-.  Currently there's really only rel-6-2-2-sv
> >
> > I intend to get another one out once I've finished working on some
> > changes to the compiler spoofing scheme.
> >
> > The current HEAD of CVS is probably best, you can use -D20070210 as
> > there have not been any updates since then.  This should be stable.
> >
> > Regards, Stuart
> >
> > On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 12:12 -0500, Ken Gilmer wrote:
> >> Hello ~
> >>
> >>    I'm incorporating LTIB into or automated integration testing
> >> system.  Looking at the CVS repository shows many labels and a few
> >> branches.  What label is recommended as a production-quality
> >> snapshot?  Does it change over time?
> >>
> >> thanks
> >> ken
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> LTIB home page: http://bitshrine.org
> >>
> >> Ltib mailing list
> >> address@hidden
> >> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib
> >
> >
>