[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Oct 2003 09:36:24 +0100 (BST) |
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Jani Monoses wrote:
> > I'd vote for keeping the casts out in the open, but I feel like I must
> > be missing something as I still don't really see the problem.
>
> I'd say we should just comment the parts of code where casts are tricky
> or made for a not immmediately obvious reason.
Sounds reasonable - any volunteers?
Kieran
- Re: [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix, Paul Riley, 2003/10/03
- [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix, Paul Riley, 2003/10/20
- Re: [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix, Kenneth Porter, 2003/10/20
- Re: [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix, Kenneth Porter, 2003/10/22
- Re: [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix, Kieran Mansley, 2003/10/23
- Re: [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix, Kenneth Porter, 2003/10/24
- Re: [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix, Leon Woestenberg, 2003/10/24
- Re: [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix, David Vrabel, 2003/10/24
- Re: [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix, Atte Kojo, 2003/10/30
- Re: [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix, Kenneth Porter, 2003/10/30
- Re: [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix, Leon Woestenberg, 2003/10/22
- Re: [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix, Kenneth Porter, 2003/10/22