RE: RE : [lwip-devel] [bug #19162]lwip_sendto:possibleto corruptremoteaddr/port connection state

[Taranowski, Thomas \(SWCOE\)]

That's interesting.  The benchmarks I performed showed lwIP performed
10-20% faster than our previously offered commercial stack :)  Seriously
though, 10-20% is pretty minimal, and could easily be due to a
non-optimal lwIP configuration or sys_arch.  It would be nice if Altera
kept supporting the lwIP port to accommodate open source applications,
but that is unlikely.  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
On
> Behalf Of Goldschmidt Simon
> Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 11:18 PM
> To: lwip-devel
> Subject: RE: RE : [lwip-devel] [bug #19162]lwip_sendto:possibleto
> corruptremoteaddr/port connection state
> 
> 
> 
> > I will continue and terminate that Thrusday, when I will back
> > to the office. I'm currently in London for NXP presentation
> > and training, and it seems that several people are interest
> > about lwIP for Trimedia processor (the platform I use)...
> 
> That's nice! What's sad is that I just saw Altera is now shipping a
> commercial stack instead of lwIP with its NIOS-II softcore processor
> (the one I use) :-(
> And they have a white-paper stating that the commercial stack is
10-20%
> faster than lwIP. I did not look into the application used for the
> benchmark, but maybe we can top that in a while? :)
> 
> Simon
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-devel