RE: RE : [lwip-devel] additional/optional protocols

[Pettinato, Jim]

We have discussed the benefit of adding an 'apps/raw_api' and an
'apps/seq_api' area to the contrib module... and there are plans (right,
Kieran?) to do so soon. I don't recall exactly but perhaps we are
waiting until the next stable release before attacking the CVS
repository layout? And I know Kieran was looking for some assistance in
the form of volunteers for that endeavor as well... (and I'm certainly
willing to help!)


-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf
Of Goldschmidt Simon
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 3:00 AM
To: lwip-devel
Subject: RE: RE : [lwip-devel] additional/optional protocols




> A DNS client could be something to share, because it's
> something than everyone could need. From memory, Jim 
> Pettinato has ported the uIP resolver to lwIP. You can ask 
> him if he can share it with you. Look for the thread "BSD API 
> tcp echo server port" in April, in mailing list archives... 

Agree

> 
> PPPoE could be an extension because I think like classic PPP,
> there is real interaction with the stack.

Agree

> 
> But SNTP, SMTP, RTP, Telnet, FTP, TFTP are only working with
> the lwIP's API, and not with other parts. So, I don't think 
> it is in the scope of lwIP. But it's my point of view, wait 
> for others answers...

I'd like to see them in CVS/contrib or somehow create another pool of
available application code using lwip API.


Simon


_______________________________________________
lwip-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-devel