|
From: | Jonathan Larmour |
Subject: | [lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning |
Date: | Wed, 30 May 2007 09:21:21 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.10) Gecko/20070223 Fedora/1.5.0.10-1.fc5 Firefox/1.5.0.10 |
Follow-up Comment #13, task #6827 (project lwip): I agree with the approach in #12. But about the hash tables, it seems unlikely in general to me to require ARP tables that size. Most people do not need simultaneous communication *on the local subnet* to that many hosts. That must be for a very specific and uncommon application. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?6827> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.nongnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |