Re: [lwip-devel] Re: [task #7040] Work on tcp_enqueue

[Jonathan Larmour]

bill wrote:
> 
> I agree.  I suppose we don't know the breakdown of the use of lwIP.  Are
> there 3 categories:
> 
> 1) Smallest code size possible.  Bandwidth doesn't matter.
> 2) Highest bandwidth possible.  Code size don't matter.
> 3) No requirement for either code or bandwidth.
> 
> I've left RAM requirements out because it is already highly configurable.

I think it's all in the project name :-).

But to some extent it's true that code size is a lot cheaper than RAM size
and there's more freedom, so it ends up as a balance.

Jifl
-- 
eCosCentric Limited      http://www.eCosCentric.com/     The eCos experts
Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK.       Tel: +44 1223 245571
Registered in England and Wales: Reg No 4422071.
------["Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere"]------       Opinions==mine