RE: [lwip-devel] [patch #6521] lwip doesn't compile in 64_bit computers

[Grubb, Jared]

For u8_t, %d is right.
For size_t.... good question. You might need a #define after all, since its 
going to be either unsigned or unsigned long (and maybe it's possible to be 
something else? But I would bet even though its not guaranteed by the standard 
you wouldn’t actually ever find anything but one of these two values)...

Jared

> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden [mailto:lwip-
> address@hidden On Behalf Of Simon
> Goldschmidt
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 11:49 AM
> To: Simon Goldschmidt; Kieran Mansley; Jonathan Larmour; Rishi Khan;
> address@hidden
> Subject: [lwip-devel] [patch #6521] lwip doesn't compile in 64_bit
> computers
> 
> 
> Update of patch #6521 (project lwip):
> 
>                   Status:                    None => In Progress
>              Assigned to:                    None => goldsimon
> 
>     _______________________________________________________
> 
> Follow-up Comment #4:
> 
> Looking through this, what's the suggested format string for
> a) size_t
> b) u8_t
> ? I guess for size_t we need a new define. Is %d OK for u8_t?
> 
> Apart from that, I've had a look through the patch: most of the changes
> are
> just wrong, but there *are* many places that need attention. I'm in the
> middle
> of this but it will take some days until I find time for it again.
> 
> Oh, and does anybody know if there any good compiler setting to warn me
> about
> wrong format arguments? I don't want to search the whole code...
> 
>     _______________________________________________________
> 
> Reply to this item at:
> 
>   <http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?6521>
> 
> _______________________________________________
>   Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah
>   http://savannah.nongnu.org/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-devel