[lwip-devel] [bug #27871] Calling tcp_abort() in recv callback can lead to accessing unallocated memory

[Kieran Mansley]

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #27871 (project lwip):

I don't mind applications using the raw API being able to call tcp_abort() -
the raw API is by design low level, so being able to do things that
applications couldn't normally do is OK.  However, documenting cases like this
where it is not possible to use tcp_abort() is probably wise.  i.e. I think
this is best solved with documentation rather than changing the code.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?27871>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/