[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-devel] [bug #28106] duplicate acknowledge for fast retransmit coul
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
[lwip-devel] [bug #28106] duplicate acknowledge for fast retransmit could have not null length |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:57:18 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.2.15 Version/10.00 |
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #28106 (project lwip):
Yes, that's an interesting case, and I agree with your deduction. It's not
just necessary because of the change to our stack, many other stacks will have
this requirement for an ACK to be seen as a duplicate.
We currently have no function to send a pure ACK with no data, but it is
necessary in this case.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?28106>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/
- [lwip-devel] [bug #28106] duplicate acknowledge for fast retransmit could have not null length, Oleg Tyshev, 2009/11/27
- [lwip-devel] [bug #28106] duplicate acknowledge for fast retransmit could have not null length,
Kieran Mansley <=
- [lwip-devel] [bug #28106] duplicate acknowledge for fast retransmit could have not null length, Kieran Mansley, 2009/11/27
- [lwip-devel] [bug #28106] duplicate acknowledge for fast retransmit could have not null length, Oleg Tyshev, 2009/11/27
- [lwip-devel] [bug #28106] duplicate acknowledge for fast retransmit could have not null length, Kieran Mansley, 2009/11/27
- [lwip-devel] [bug #28106] duplicate acknowledge for fast retransmit could have not null length, Simon Goldschmidt, 2009/11/29
- [lwip-devel] [bug #28106] duplicate acknowledge for fast retransmit could have not null length, Simon Goldschmidt, 2009/11/29
- [lwip-devel] [bug #28106] duplicate acknowledge for fast retransmit could have not null length, Oleg Tyshev, 2009/11/30
- [lwip-devel] [bug #28106] duplicate acknowledge for fast retransmit could have not null length, Simon Goldschmidt, 2009/11/30
- [lwip-devel] [bug #28106] duplicate acknowledge for fast retransmit could have not null length, Oleg Tyshev, 2009/11/30
- [lwip-devel] [bug #28106] duplicate acknowledge for fast retransmit could have not null length, Simon Goldschmidt, 2009/11/30