lwip-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lwip-devel] [task #10088] Correctly implement close() vs. shutdown()


From: Kieran Mansley
Subject: [lwip-devel] [task #10088] Correctly implement close() vs. shutdown()
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:53:04 +0000
User-agent: Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.2.15 Version/10.00

Follow-up Comment #6, task #10088 (project lwip):

> Does shutdown(SHUT_RDWR) also do that?

Not sure.  I'd have to check. 

> We already have that information: the application tells TCP 
> about that by calling tcp_recved(). Isn't it enought to check 
> the receive window? If it has the initial size, no more data 
> should be buffered at higher levels.

Interesting idea, and should work I think.  The only reason it wouldn't would
be if any of the layers delay calling tcp_recved() rather than doing so as
soon as it has been passed to the application.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?10088>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]