Re: [lwip-devel] Re: lwip-devel Digest, Vol 70, Issue 4

[Kieran Mansley]

On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 22:45 +0800, edgar wrote:
> The problem just is that: if tcpip_thread received message very fast,
> waitting case would not occur while fetching from mbox,
> then expire would be enlarged,

OK, I think I see what you're saying - we might not process timeout
handlers appropriately.

Simon: sys_mbox_post() has gone from CVS head I think.  Has this problem
gone too, or just moved into the ports?  Edgar: it would help if you
could update to the current CVS code and see if your problem is already
solved as this code has changed since the last release.

> tcp_slowtmr called every 500ms is not true any more.

That shouldn't happen.  How are you arranging to call tcp_tmr()?

Kieran