lwip-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lwip-devel] IPv6 support and source code access


From: SebastianUnger
Subject: [lwip-devel] IPv6 support and source code access
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:43:32 -0500

Hi there,
 
I'm a senior embedded software engineer working for Eaton in New Zealand. We are currently switching the IP stack in our products from a commercial stack to LWIP. So far I'm quite pleased with the progress we've made and with LWIP itself.
 
We are using the head of the CVS repository and pulling that on a semi-regular basis into a vendor branch in our own SVN repo.
 
I have a few questions:
 
1. I saw that you also have a GIT repository. Should we be using the head of that or are they frequently synced? Which one is the master?
 
2. While integrating LWIP into our software, we made a number of changes to fix bugs and improve efficiency and I would like to contribute those back in order to minimize the differences when I merge in changes from upstream. How should I go about doing that? Are patches sent to this mailing list the best way?
 
3. One of the new features we need to support is IPv6. I have succeeded enabling and compiling IPv6 and have established an IPv6 based web connection with our product. However, when I ran the IPv6ready logo test suite, it failed quite a large number of tests. I am planning on going through these and fix as many as I think are essential for good IPv6 operation. We do not (at this time) aim for an actual certification, but I would like to have all failing tests understood and documented. So my question is, who are the people that are currently working on IPv6 (if any) and what is the best way for us to synchronize these efforts so we do not duplicate the work and stomp on each others feed. Also, again, what is the best way to submit changes I make? If it is necessary for me to send patches to the mailing list, I may have to send them in larger batches. Direct repository access might be more efficient and allow me to post changes daily. However, I don't know how that fits with your policies etc.
 
4. Do you have a coding std document, that I can review to avoid either having my patches rejected because the code isn't formatted right or for someone to have to go through them afterwards.
 
Cheers,
Seb
 
 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]