lwip-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lwip-devel] [bug #38404] getpeeraddr returns success on unconnected/lis


From: Thomas Taranowski
Subject: [lwip-devel] [bug #38404] getpeeraddr returns success on unconnected/listening TCP sockets
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 03:40:54 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.97 Safari/537.22

URL:
  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?38404>

                 Summary: getpeeraddr returns success on unconnected/listening
TCP sockets
                 Project: lwIP - A Lightweight TCP/IP stack
            Submitted by: taranowski
            Submitted on: Mon 25 Feb 2013 03:40:53 AM GMT
                Category: None
                Severity: 3 - Normal
              Item Group: None
                  Status: None
                 Privacy: Public
             Assigned to: None
             Open/Closed: Open
         Discussion Lock: Any
         Planned Release: 
            lwIP version: 1.4.0

    _______________________________________________________

Details:

getpeeraddr returns success on TCP sockets that have no peer ( are unconnected
or in the listening state ).  The correct response is to return ENOTCONN.

The patch: getpeeraddr_return_error_on_unconnected_socket.patch, is provided
to show the proposed fix.


  



    _______________________________________________________

File Attachments:


-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon 25 Feb 2013 03:40:53 AM GMT  Name:
getpeeraddr_return_error_on_unconnected_socket.patch  Size: 810B   By:
taranowski

<http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/download.php?file_id=27520>

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?38404>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]