[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-devel] Behaviour of netifapi_netif_set_addr()
|
From: |
Freddie Chopin |
|
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-devel] Behaviour of netifapi_netif_set_addr() |
|
Date: |
Tue, 05 Apr 2016 13:26:01 +0200 |
On wto, 2016-04-05 at 13:11 +0200, Dirk Ziegelmeier wrote:
> I think it's a good idea. So far noone seems to have objections. May
> I ask you for a patch ;-)
Which option would you prefer? No.1 - 3 new netifapi_...() functions -
or No.2 - special treatment of NULL in netifapi_netif_set_addr()?
Regards,
FCh
- [lwip-devel] Behaviour of netifapi_netif_set_addr(), Freddie Chopin, 2016/04/01
- Re: [lwip-devel] Behaviour of netifapi_netif_set_addr(), Dirk Ziegelmeier, 2016/04/05
- Re: [lwip-devel] Behaviour of netifapi_netif_set_addr(),
Freddie Chopin <=
- Re: [lwip-devel] Behaviour of netifapi_netif_set_addr(), Dirk Ziegelmeier, 2016/04/05
- Re: [lwip-devel] Behaviour of netifapi_netif_set_addr(), Freddie Chopin, 2016/04/05
- Re: [lwip-devel] Behaviour of netifapi_netif_set_addr(), Dirk Ziegelmeier, 2016/04/05
- Re: [lwip-devel] Behaviour of netifapi_netif_set_addr(), Freddie Chopin, 2016/04/05
- Re: [lwip-devel] Behaviour of netifapi_netif_set_addr(), Dirk Ziegelmeier, 2016/04/05
- Re: [lwip-devel] Behaviour of netifapi_netif_set_addr(), Dirk Ziegelmeier, 2016/04/14