[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-devel] PPP LCP Phases Not Enum in 2.0.0 Beta
From: |
Sylvain Rochet |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-devel] PPP LCP Phases Not Enum in 2.0.0 Beta |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Aug 2016 00:51:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 08:05:49PM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> Greg Smith wrote:
> >So, with that said, I'd like to argue again for enumerated types for the
> >values, even if the variables are of other types. What do you think?
>
> Actually, I don't really care. Defining these things as enum might really be
> a little better...
Same, that's just cosmetic for me, so I don't mind either way :)
I am almost never using debuggers, and when I have to, which only
happens once a year, it's always plain gdb or with a gdb proxy link, so
I never noticed there is something fancy in enum output in debuggers :-)
Sylvain
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [lwip-devel] PPP LCP Phases Not Enum in 2.0.0 Beta, Greg Smith, 2016/08/01
- Re: [lwip-devel] PPP LCP Phases Not Enum in 2.0.0 Beta, Sylvain Rochet, 2016/08/01
- Re: [lwip-devel] PPP LCP Phases Not Enum in 2.0.0 Beta, Sylvain Rochet, 2016/08/01
- Re: [lwip-devel] PPP LCP Phases Not Enum in 2.0.0 Beta, Sylvain Rochet, 2016/08/01
- Re: [lwip-devel] PPP LCP Phases Not Enum in 2.0.0 Beta, Simon Goldschmidt, 2016/08/02
- Re: [lwip-devel] PPP LCP Phases Not Enum in 2.0.0 Beta, Greg Smith, 2016/08/02
- Re: [lwip-devel] PPP LCP Phases Not Enum in 2.0.0 Beta, Greg Smith, 2016/08/02
- Re: [lwip-devel] PPP LCP Phases Not Enum in 2.0.0 Beta, Greg Smith, 2016/08/03
- Re: [lwip-devel] PPP LCP Phases Not Enum in 2.0.0 Beta, address@hidden, 2016/08/03
- Re: [lwip-devel] PPP LCP Phases Not Enum in 2.0.0 Beta,
Sylvain Rochet <=