lwip-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lwip-devel] PPP LCP Phases Not Enum in 2.0.0 Beta


From: Sylvain Rochet
Subject: Re: [lwip-devel] PPP LCP Phases Not Enum in 2.0.0 Beta
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 00:51:09 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

Hello,

On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 08:05:49PM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> Greg Smith wrote:
> >So, with that said, I'd like to argue again for enumerated types for the
> >values, even if the variables are of other types. What do you think?
> 
> Actually, I don't really care. Defining these things as enum might really be
> a little better...

Same, that's just cosmetic for me, so I don't mind either way :)

I am almost never using debuggers, and when I have to, which only 
happens once a year, it's always plain gdb or with a gdb proxy link, so 
I never noticed there is something fancy in enum output in debuggers :-)

Sylvain

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]