[lwip-devel] [task #14420] Remove sys_sem_signal from inside SYS_ARCH_PROTECT crit section

[Joel Cunningham]

Follow-up Comment #6, task #14420 (project lwip):

Reviewed the change, exactly what I was thinking, thanks :)

For non-core locking support, are you thinking the use of sys_sem_signal while
inside SYS_ARCH_PROTECT can be fixed at a later time (possibly when requested
by another dev)?

Or is this even the start of not investing time into improving the non-core
locking case because it's not the default locking mechanism and performs
worse?

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?14420>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/