[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:01:59 +0000 (GMT) |
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Jani Monoses wrote:
> > Different question...
> > One of the primary reasons I started working with LWIP was because
> > of the ability to use the sockets API or the sequential API depending
> > on system needs. So far I have exclusively used the sockets API.
> > Does anyone have any idea what percentage of users are using sockets
> > vs. sequential?
>
> No but we can have a poll :)
>
> Sockets only here.
This could generate a lot of email! Ah well...
Sockets only here too, but not the same implementation as is distributed.
Kieran
- [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Ed Sutter, 2004/02/23
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Jani Monoses, 2004/02/23
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Jani Monoses, 2004/02/23
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Ed Sutter, 2004/02/23
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Ed Sutter, 2004/02/23
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Jani Monoses, 2004/02/24
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, christiaan . simons, 2004/02/24
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW,
Kieran Mansley <=
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Peter Graf, 2004/02/24
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, lukem . lwip, 2004/02/24
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Larry Piggins, 2004/02/25
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Kaos, 2004/02/25
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Leon Woestenberg, 2004/02/26
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Ed Sutter, 2004/02/27
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Kieran Mansley, 2004/02/27