Re: [lwip-users] Recent tcp_rexmit() changes

[Karl Jeacle]

On Mon 26 Jul 04, 09:09:03 +0100, K.J. Mansley wrote:
> That is a possibility, and although I don't like dumping the whole
> unacked queue on the unsent queue just in case it's necessary, it would
> solve your problem.  My only worry is that it might result (if we're not
> careful) in a large number of segments being put on the network as a
> result of a loss, which is completely the opposite of what the sender
> should be doing.

I don't think a large number of segments can be sent out because we're
in slow start, and the window is therefore tiny. I think there was
some method in the original madness!

> much work, so may have a look later today.  Perhaps if I do get
> something coded up you'd be willing to test/debug it for us?

Sure, would be happy to try it out.

Karl