Re: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL

[Mumtaz Ahmad]

Well probably i quoted it wrong . Infact I have implemented BSD style API
that are much simpler than lwip BSD layer but they do require a
multithreading environment for sure. These API use simple thread safe
mechanism instead of lwip message boxes. The system is yet in testing .

Regards

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andrew Lentvorski" <address@hidden>
To: "Mailing list for lwIP users" <address@hidden>
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL


> Mumtaz Ahmad wrote:
> > Dear Simons
> >
> > Thats a better way and i have also used it and created my own sequential
> > APIs using this locking mechanism .This helped me to get a BSD style
socket
> > api with the approximate performance of raw api .
>
> Do you have code available to share about this?
>
> A BSD-style API which does not require a threading system would be a
> nice addition to lwIP.
>
> -a
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users