[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] the sequentiality of the lwip stack
From: |
Simon Goldschmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] the sequentiality of the lwip stack |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:08:47 +0100 |
Martin Velek wrote:
> It is not quite true that you
> cannot use one socket in e.g. two threads simultaneously.
While it might work for you (possibly after inspecting the code in detail),
it still is not supported: it might not work in the next release because
it's currently not meant to work.
So if you use it like that, use it at your own risk!
Simon
- Re: [lwip-users] the sequentiality of the lwip stack, (continued)
- Re: [lwip-users] the sequentiality of the lwip stack, Alain Mouette, 2014/03/18
- Re: [lwip-users] the sequentiality of the lwip stack, Fabian Koch, 2014/03/18
- Re: [lwip-users] the sequentiality of the lwip stack, address@hidden, 2014/03/18
- Re: [lwip-users] the sequentiality of the lwip stack, Pomeroy, Marty, 2014/03/19
- Re: [lwip-users] the sequentiality of the lwip stack, Alain Mouette, 2014/03/19
- Re: [lwip-users] the sequentiality of the lwip stack, Simon Goldschmidt, 2014/03/19
- Re: [lwip-users] the sequentiality of the lwip stack, Martin Velek, 2014/03/24
- Re: [lwip-users] the sequentiality of the lwip stack,
Simon Goldschmidt <=