[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] idle connection timeout
From: |
mobin.seven |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] idle connection timeout |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:39:33 -0700 (MST) |
Simon Goldschmidt-2 wrote
> mobin.seven wrote:
>> I want to close idle connections on server side with 15s timeout.
>> Is SO_RCVTIMEO what I need?
>> I use this line:
>> int timeout = 15000;
>> lwip_setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO, &timeout,
>> sizeof(timeout));
>
> Where did you get that line from? lwIP tries to implement the standard.
> And the standard says (google for "opengroup so_rcvtimeo" and you find
> it) that it "accepts a timeval structure" for SO_RCVTIMEO. I guess you
> have been using winsock before (they use a DWORD pointer with
> miliseconds)? Winsock is in most cases not a good example when trying to
> write portable code :-)
>
>
> Simon
Thanks.
yes I'm coming from winsock :D I edited my code:
struct timeval tv;
tv.tv_sec= 0;
tv.tv_usec= 500;
lwip_setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO, &tv, sizeof(struct
timeval));// returns 92
I'm still getting ENOPROTOOPT !
Is it wrong yet?
Thank you
--
View this message in context:
http://lwip.100.n7.nabble.com/idle-connection-timeout-tp23252p23261.html
Sent from the lwip-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- [lwip-users] idle connection timeout, mobin.seven, 2014/09/15
- Re: [lwip-users] idle connection timeout, Ari Suutari, 2014/09/15
- Re: [lwip-users] idle connection timeout, Noam weissman, 2014/09/15
- Re: [lwip-users] idle connection timeout, address@hidden, 2014/09/15
- Re: [lwip-users] idle connection timeout,
mobin.seven <=
- Re: [lwip-users] idle connection timeout, Simon Goldschmidt, 2014/09/16
- Re: [lwip-users] idle connection timeout, mobin.seven, 2014/09/16
- Re: [lwip-users] idle connection timeout, mobin.seven, 2014/09/16
- Re: [lwip-users] idle connection timeout, mobin.seven, 2014/09/17
- Re: [lwip-users] idle connection timeout, mobin.seven, 2014/09/22