[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] PolarSSL and mbedTLS
From: |
Jan Menzel |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] PolarSSL and mbedTLS |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Mar 2017 21:54:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 |
Hi Noam!
Did you follow the error code through mbedtls's net.c? In my code its
translated into "MBEDTLS_ERR_SSL_WANT_READ" as follows:
int mbedtls_net_recv( void *ctx, unsigned char *buf, size_t len )
[...]
ret = (int) read( fd, buf, len );
if( ret < 0 )
{
if( net_would_block( ctx ) != 0 )
return( MBEDTLS_ERR_SSL_WANT_READ );
[...]
with
static int net_would_block( const mbedtls_net_context *ctx )
[...]
switch( errno )
{
#if defined EAGAIN
case EAGAIN:
#endif
#if defined EWOULDBLOCK && EWOULDBLOCK != EAGAIN
case EWOULDBLOCK:
#endif
return( 1 );
}
return( 0 );
}
Jan
On 15.03.2017 20:30, Noam Weissman wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> I have triad debugging my code and added :
> #define LWIP_DEBUG LWIP_DBG_ON
> #define SOCKETS_DEBUG LWIP_DBG_ON
>
> Strange that with this switches on I am able to get a file of about 38K but
> it fails at the last part, always?.
>
> Without the debug prints it never even starts, it fails on first read.
>
> I have attached my debug printout if that helps.
>
> The text is mixed with my own debug prints, sorry:
>
> File transfer starts at line 438 with: From WssHandleReadData: PayloadLen =
> 38032, DataLen = 1020
>
> The server sends chunks of 4K, my code reads 1K at a time from the ssl layer
> hence the 1024 chunks.
> You can see that PayloadLen reduces by the DataLen chunk ...
>
> The last part received is PayloadLen 1172 DataLen 1024 ... on line 1512
>
> It should read one 1024 block and then 148 bytes and finish... This never
> happens and it fails on last read
> This is consistent on every test I did ?.
>
> If I turn off the two debug switches the file transfer never starts, actually
> fails on first read and the lwip_recvfrom
> returns with -1 and set_errno(EWOULDBLOCK); on line 773 in sockets.c (lwip
> ver 2.02)
>
>
> Any ideas ?
>
>
> Many thanks,
> Noam.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lwip-users [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Simon Goldschmidt
> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 10:36 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [lwip-users] PolarSSL and mbedTLS
>
> Noam Weissman wrote:
>> I get a read error inside lwip_recvfrom function.
>> [..]
>> If anyone has any ideas on what more to check or test please respond.
>
> 1: Get an idea of the error (if recvfrom returns -1, what's the corrent
> errno?)
> 2: Get a debugger and try to find out why recvfrom returns an error. Without
> that information, there's no way of knowing where the error is.
>
> Simon
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
>
- Re: [lwip-users] PolarSSL and mbedTLS, (continued)
- Re: [lwip-users] PolarSSL and mbedTLS, address@hidden, 2017/03/11
- Re: [lwip-users] PolarSSL and mbedTLS, Noam Weissman, 2017/03/11
- Re: [lwip-users] PolarSSL and mbedTLS, address@hidden, 2017/03/11
- Re: [lwip-users] PolarSSL and mbedTLS, Noam Weissman, 2017/03/11
- Re: [lwip-users] PolarSSL and mbedTLS, Noam Weissman, 2017/03/12
- Re: [lwip-users] PolarSSL and mbedTLS, Jan Menzel, 2017/03/14
- Re: [lwip-users] PolarSSL and mbedTLS, Noam Weissman, 2017/03/14
- Re: [lwip-users] PolarSSL and mbedTLS, Dr. Jan Menzel, 2017/03/14
- Re: [lwip-users] PolarSSL and mbedTLS, Noam Weissman, 2017/03/15
- Re: [lwip-users] PolarSSL and mbedTLS, address@hidden, 2017/03/15
- Re: [lwip-users] PolarSSL and mbedTLS,
Jan Menzel <=
- Re: [lwip-users] PolarSSL and mbedTLS, Noam Weissman, 2017/03/16
- Re: [lwip-users] PolarSSL and mbedTLS, goldsimon, 2017/03/16
- [lwip-users] Subnet too large?, Stephen Cowell, 2017/03/16
- Re: [lwip-users] Subnet too large?, goldsimon, 2017/03/16
- Re: [lwip-users] Subnet too large?, Stephen Cowell, 2017/03/16
- Re: [lwip-users] Subnet too large?, address@hidden, 2017/03/16
- Re: [lwip-users] PolarSSL and mbedTLS, Noam Weissman, 2017/03/16
- Re: [lwip-users] PolarSSL and mbedTLS, Noam Weissman, 2017/03/26
- Re: [lwip-users] PolarSSL and mbedTLS, Mikael Eiman, 2017/03/26
- Re: [lwip-users] PolarSSL and mbedTLS, Dr. Jan Menzel, 2017/03/16