lwip-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lwip-users] [EXTERNAL] Re: LWIP_NETCONN_FULLDUPLEX sys_mbox_free ex


From: Kellar, Christopher
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] [EXTERNAL] Re: LWIP_NETCONN_FULLDUPLEX sys_mbox_free example
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 14:36:46 +0000

Hello,

First thank you for your very fast reply. I think that was record time for me 
on any blog.

Second, I am glad to hear that this is being reported. I was thinking that I 
was doing something odd. I am running lwIP and really am in need of full duplex 
mode. The reason for this is because on top of lwIP I am running a RabbitMq 
client which really requires a full duplex solution to have high bandwidth. I 
am running a similar RabbitMq client in full duplex on CentOS.

I will continue to investigate and try to find a solution. Do you think that a 
solution on your end is on the horizon?

Thanks again,
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: lwip-users [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Simon Goldschmidt
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2018 9:28 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [lwip-users] LWIP_NETCONN_FULLDUPLEX sys_mbox_free 
example

Kellar, Christopher wrote:
> Could you please provide an example of what the sys_mbox_free should
> look like when LWIP_NETCONN_FULLDUPLEX = 1 (has to unblock receive
> tasks waiting on recvmbox/acceptmbox and prevent a task pending on
> this during/after deletion)? I am trying to implement this on an STM32 device 
> running FreeRTOS.

Besides DHCPv6, solving this in a general way is one of the last steps to 2.1.0.
See https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?52554

> I am also seeing some failures when I attempt to close the netconn from a 
> third thread.
> The code is hanging inside lwip_netconn_do_delconn  on the
> sys_sem_signal because either the op_completed_sem semaphore variable is 
> corrupted.

That's also covered by the above bug report.

What's your background on this, do you have code that runs this way (e.g. under 
linux) but fails with lwIP or do you just try to program something full duplex?

> I would really appreciate some assistance.

I don't know when I'll find the time for this, though.

Simon

_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
[CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY NOTICE] Information transmitted by this email is 
proprietary to Medtronic and is intended for use only by the individual or 
entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is private, 
privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you 
are not the intended recipient or it appears that this mail has been forwarded 
to you without proper authority, you are notified that any use or dissemination 
of this information in any manner is strictly prohibited. In such cases, please 
delete this mail from your records. To view this notice in other languages you 
can either select the following link or manually copy and paste the link into 
the address bar of a web browser: http://emaildisclaimer.medtronic.com

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]