[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?)
From: |
Filip M Gieszczykiewicz |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?) |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Nov 1996 08:30:56 -0600 (CST) |
You (Steve Holmes) wrote:
> That sounds like an interesting idea. I would only have
> reservations concerning "lynx'isms" into rendered heml code. But
> Netscapes does it also so.... As for saving bookmarks, Netscape simply
> adds it to the end of the bookmark file (in the last list) and any further
> editing has to be done through the bookmark editor provided. What I like
> is the little pulldowns they add for the different subheadings of the
> bookmark file.Lynx doesn't presently have any features like that.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Greetings. Yeah it does :-) See URL:
http://www.paranoia.com/~filipg/TEMP/
And I might even play around with the idea of giving each current
sub-bookmark a list of sub-sub links... That would allow people
to create a sub-bookmark called "WWW" and than up to 26 sub-divisions
of that... You could have WWW.Validators, and WWW.References, etc.
Yes, you might want more... BUT, I think I might be able to work
this into my patch (with my meager C abilities) so if there is demand for
this, please let me know.
BTW, I think I will keep the structure and file definitions in the
lynxcfg file... do people want seperate file for everything (ie. each
WWW.* member would have a seperate file) or some scheme for keeping
it in one file (ie. WWW.* members in one file).
I could use something like this... so that's the only reason I'm
interested :-)
Take care.
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, (continued)
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Al Gilman, 1996/11/08
- LYNX-DEV trickle-down development?, gregory j. rosmaita, 1996/11/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Walter Skorski, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Filip M Gieszczykiewicz, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, gregory j. rosmaita, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Filip M Gieszczykiewicz, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), Walter Skorski, 1996/11/06
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), Walter Skorski, 1996/11/06
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), Filip M Gieszczykiewicz, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), Steve Holmes, 1996/11/11
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?),
Filip M Gieszczykiewicz <=
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Multibookmark patch, Bela Lubkin, 1996/11/03
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Multibookmark patch, Bela Lubkin, 1996/11/04