[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release
From: |
Greg Marr |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Sep 1998 08:55:19 -0400 |
At 10:21 AM 9/2/98 +0900, you wrote:
>> To: address@hidden
>[...]
>> X-Mailer: Lynx, Version 2.8.1dev.24
>>
>> 1) If this post hits the list, then you know by analyzing the mail
>> headers that there is one serious bug that needs to be corrected
>
>I'm replying to my own post just to be sure it is clear who did what.
>Lynx was the mailer, and it (all versions past and present AFAIK) is
>allowing blind copy. I am not responsible for detecting the bug, but
>I want it out in the open so that it cannot be ignored. IMHO, it is
>extremely serious, and unless fixed Lynx loses all credibility. OTOH,
>if it is fixed, there most certainly will be a rush to upgrade.
Why is allowing BCC a bug? IMHO, the mailers that DON'T allow BCCs (such as
previous versions of MS's Outlook Express and Internet Mail) are the ones with
the bugs.
--
Greg Marr
address@hidden
"We thought you were dead."
"I was, but I'm better now." - Sheridan, "The Summoning"
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release, (continued)
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release, Ulrich Hausmann, 1998/09/01
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release, dickey, 1998/09/01
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release, Ulrich Hausmann, 1998/09/01
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release, webmgr, 1998/09/01
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release, Leonid Pauzner, 1998/09/01
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release, dickey, 1998/09/01
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/09/01
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release,
Greg Marr <=
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release, Bela Lubkin, 1998/09/01
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/09/01
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release, Leonid Pauzner, 1998/09/02
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release, dickey, 1998/09/02
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1 release, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/09/02